Why Detaining terrorist in Guantanamo Bay was against American Essay

Why Detaining terrorist in Guantanamo talk was against American Philosophy - endeavor ExampleHamdan, a diminutive Yemeni who had been detained in Guantanamo Bay for more than five years, was kept in a tiny room kept cold with air conditioning, while he had nothing right to cover himself, not horizontal a pair of socks. Swift shared his thoughts with his partner law professor, Neal Katyal, who had been preparing well-grounded briefs on the matter of President Bushs military tribunals. Katyal made his have got efforts in writing drafts for the unconditional Court and the Court of Appeals trying to figure out what the Department of Defense was going to include in the new guidelines for the Guantanamo Bay detainees. Although the Supreme Court declared the military tribunals as illegal, still Congress protested and passed its own ruling regarding the secluded Guantanamo. This was a defeat of American philosophy. So, the lawyers, Swift and Katyal, decided to challenge Congress.Why detaining terrorists in Guantanamo Bay is against the American philosophy has many fair reasons. It is not legal in any case, accord to homophile rights, to deprive a prisoner of war of his legal right of either being well-tried or released if proved innocent. The detainees at Guantanamo Bay are neither tried nor released, and they do not even know why they have been brought there and kept in brutal torture. Detainees have been held in Guantanamo Bay without charge for more than five years many of whom have been subjected to severe abuses. This has significantly torn isolated American reputation of war. Guantanamo has become an epitome of lawlessness in the eyes of the whole world. American philosophy has enabled the United States to stand among one of the strongest democracies which support human rights and which make other nations comply with the international standards of human rights and humanitarian laws. But now, even the allies of the Bushs administration are looking at G uantanamo policy as a failure and violation of American philosophy of war and human rights. Carafano and Rona suppose thatThat the